Comparing Plato and Aristotle on government and the concept of good.

Plato is primarily come to with cunning the technical. In the Republic, Plato intends to define lecturer and describes an elaborate urban center- verbalise setup with the goal of being a right city. A guardian class of philosophers rules in Platos city, because these nuclear number 18 the all muckle who chiffonier pillow with the good. Everyone elses role in the city is to do their work to maintenance the city so that the guardians are able to philosophize. Aristotle does non cost this concept of knowing the good, only if instead advocates doing good. In Aristotles city, people should do the high hat they can at their craft so they can flourish and be good. This concept carries over to the political science of the city, as political scientists should do good by making provided laws that allow the citizens to do good through just habituation. Because Plato is primarily concerned with knowing the good, while Aristotle is primarily concerned with being good, I will show that they have contrastive political theories, and that Aristotles political theory is more realistic and getable than Platos political theory. Although Plato never says what the good actually is, he does state that only philosophers can know what the good is (). Plato offers two analogies as to why philosophers are qualified of ruling, and why they should rule.

The first is the similarity of a send out. On this ship, the master is removed and the sailors chip for control of the ship. The sailors who take power of the ship are not the best fit to navigate, but they are the best at practicing political science and building a interest of people. The sailors! who are best fit to navigate do not practice politics and are not given the chance to rule. These sailors are the philosophers of the beingness; they are... If you want to get a mount essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper