Nation-State Boundaries are Becoming Obsolete Essay

Nation-State Boundaries are Becoming Obsolete - Essay Example1997, p.1). Many professionals ranging from commentators to journalists, from politicians to scholars across all disciplines, wear tried to describe and analyze this phenomenon and tend to agree that globalization, along with the halt of the Cold War, has radically changed the underlying rules of the game for a variety of key factors, particularly states (Smith et al. 1997, p.1).With the onset of this globalization and transnational companies, there come been long debates about the relationship of alleged(prenominal) sovereign states to each other (Wallerstein 1999, p.20). Wallerstein (1999) states that views range from those who emphasize the potent sovereignty of the various states to those who are cynical about the ability of so-called weak states to resist the pressures (and blandishments) of so-called strong states. Krasner (1999, p.34), on the other hand, reports that whatsoever analysts argue to the point that t he world is entering into a clean era, one in which the existing institutional structures, especially the sovereign state (by which they often mean several(prenominal) different things) is being undermined weakened, marginalized, or transmuted, by globalization.According to Krasner (1999, p.34-35), globalization can mean some assortment of developments that might include the legitimization of human rights, the digitalization of transactions, the speed of communication, the density of global non-governmental organization (NGO) networks, the transmission of diseases, the amplification of international capital markets, the surge of manufacturing in geographically dispersed areas, the universal availability of MTV, the increase in illegal migration, legal migration, and the like. Most analyses that emphasize the growing importance of globalization point to the transformatory nature of raw technology e.g. costs of communication and transportation have plummeted.Kelleher and Klein (1 999, p.146) defines sovereignty in that states accept no semipolitical authority as superseding their own. According to the principle, no international institution has the right to determine the laws and policies that apply to throng inwardly the borders of any sovereign state. Sovereignty, then, has the effect of de cutating government as the sole representative of the population of a state (Kelleher and Klein 1999, p.146). Krasner (1999, p.35) also provided that the term sovereignty has been commonly used in at least quartette different ways1. Interdependence sovereignty has referred to the ability of a government to actually control activities within and across its borders (including the movement of goods, capital, ideas, and disease vectors).2. Domestic sovereignty has referred to the organization of authority within a effrontery polity.3. Westphalian sovereignty has referred to the exclusion of extraneous authority the right of a government to be independent of external aut hority structures.4. International legal sovereignty has referred to the recognition of one state by another some entities have been recognized by other states others have not. Recognition has been associated with diplomatic immunity and the right to sign treaties and join international organizations.Globalization A Threat to SovereigntyAccording to Krasner (1999, p.36), many observers have suggested that the increase in