Akira Kurosawa and Robert Zemeckis Essay -- essays papers

Akira Kurosawa and Robert Zemeckis As the term suggests, an auteur is an author, someone whose aesthetic sensibilities and impact are most important in the creation of a schoolbook. With literary texts, discerning authorship is usually no problem. But with collaborative art forms, such as film, deciding on authorship is much more complicated. Generally speaking, film theorists have concluded that it is the handler of a film who is the auteur, the most important creative figure.But auteur theory is touch with more that one film it is concerned with the movement of a director with his or her whole corpus of films, and with certain dominant themes and stylistic aspects of these films. The text in auteur criticism is not one film, but the body of work of the director. Although both Akira Kurosawa and Robert Zemeckis have make many successful films there is a distinct difference in the filmmakers works. The authorship of the film is what creates the distinction in the midst of Kurosawa and Zemeckis films. Examining authorship is a challenge critics and writers have been attempting to do it for years. The most schoolwide description that I have found is the one quoted above from Bergers Cultural Criticism. In non-technical language, authorship is looked upon as an unknown distinct portion that one of the films cast or crew brings to it. unceasingly changing, this unknown element may be derived from, an actor, director, editor or even so a cinematographer. In the past there have been two distinctions made by critics regarding authorship. There is the claim that there is an elitist group of filmmakers who have a distinct definable quality to all of their films regardless of whether they are considered neat or bad quality films. In essence, the caliber of the film itself seems to be irrelevant to the theory. This group is categorized under the much sought by and by term of auteur. This said, a bad film made by an auteur is alleged(a) to better th an the best film made by a metteur en scene. This brings us to the idea of what can be considered when examining a metteur en scene. The definition seems to take on exactly the opposite quality than that of an auteur. A metteur en scene may make decent or even devout films, but there seems to be a link missing when analyze all their works as a whole. When regarding the works of an Auteur, we must construe their films as a... ...e is how he creates his film much of this is the level of control that a director exercises upon his body of work.Throughout Kurosawas career, he worked hard to repeatedly bequest the themes, which were important to him. This is not always the case in Zemeckis films, as we do not see Zemeckis using the same themes consistently without his works. utilize subjectivity, Kurosawa was able to bring the audience into the minds and hearts of the characters involved. Thus, Akira Kurosawas work is clearly sea captain to directors who presented their stories m ore objectively. BibliographyWorks CitedBerger, Arthur Asa. Cultural Criticism A Primer of separate Concepts. London SAGE Publications, 1995Mackinnon, Gillies. Haunting visions. Sight & Sound ns 4 (1994) 61Peary, Gerald. Akira Kurosawa Japans existential cowboy looks West and thinks East American Film v. 14 (1989) 80-82 Ritchie, Donald. The Films Of Akira Kurosawa Third Edition. Los Angeles University of California Press, 1998Saynor, James. Accidental Auteur, Sight & Sound v.3 (1993) 4-8Seltzer, Alex. Akira Kurosawa seeing through the eyes of the audience. Film Comment v. 29 (1993) 72-77